Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
paper_format_for_review [2019/03/26 15:44] (current) nakano created |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Paper Format For Review ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This Web page shows **Paper Formatting Guideline** for review, which is applied to CANDAR main symposium and workshops (excluding NCSS workshop). | ||
+ | |||
+ | This page is not for for NCSS workshop. Papers submitted to NCSS workshop must be the final version and should include authors names and affiliations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Important**: For fairness of review process and paper selection, papers will be reviewed by **double blind**. So they should not contain authors names and affiliations, any grant information, and personal acknowledgements by which authors can be identified. | ||
+ | Further, authors prior works must be referred to as **3rd-persons works**. | ||
+ | Papers do not follow the submission guidelines including paper format, page length, and anonymity of authors, will not be accepted. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Paper Format ===== | ||
+ | Submitted paper must use **IEEE standard US-letter two-column format** ([[http://www.ieee.org/conferences_events/conferences/publishing/templates.html]]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Page limitation ===== | ||
+ | * CANDAR main symposium | ||
+ | * Long paper: 8-10 pages | ||
+ | * Regular paper: 5-7 pages | ||
+ | * Workshops (excluding WANC and NCSS) | ||
+ | * Regular paper: 5-7 pages | ||
+ | * Poster paper: 3-4 pages | ||
+ | * WANC workshop | ||
+ | * Short paper: 4-5 pages | ||
+ | * Poster paper: 2-3 pages | ||
+ | |||
+ | Submitted paper may be accepted as papers in shorter page-length category. | ||
+ | For example, CANDAR Long paper maybe accepted as CANDAR Regular paper. | ||
+ | If this is the case, the final paper must satisfy the page limitation of CANDAR Regular paper. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =====Double-blind review===== | ||
+ | Papers should **NOT** contain | ||
+ | authors names and affiliations | ||
+ | grant information and personal acknowledgements | ||
+ | On the other hand, authors previous related works **should not be omitted**, and | ||
+ | they must be referred to as **3rd-persons works**. | ||
+ | For example, if you improve your own prior work, you should write: | ||
+ | |||
+ | While the authors of [?] did X, this paper additionally did Y. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You SHOULD NOT write: | ||
+ | |||
+ | While our previous paper of [?] did X, this paper additionally did Y. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Please see {{ :doubleblind.pdf |Sample PDF file}} for the details. | ||
+ | Papers do not satisfy these conditions for double-blind review may be rejected without review. | ||