Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
paper_format_for_review [2019/03/26 15:44] (current) nakano created |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Paper Format For Review ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This Web page shows **Paper Formatting Guideline** for review, which is applied to CANDAR main symposium and workshops (excluding NCSS workshop). | ||
| + | |||
| + | This page is not for for NCSS workshop. Papers submitted to NCSS workshop must be the final version and should include authors names and affiliations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Important**: For fairness of review process and paper selection, papers will be reviewed by **double blind**. So they should not contain authors names and affiliations, any grant information, and personal acknowledgements by which authors can be identified. | ||
| + | Further, authors prior works must be referred to as **3rd-persons works**. | ||
| + | Papers do not follow the submission guidelines including paper format, page length, and anonymity of authors, will not be accepted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Paper Format ===== | ||
| + | Submitted paper must use **IEEE standard US-letter two-column format** ([[http://www.ieee.org/conferences_events/conferences/publishing/templates.html]]). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Page limitation ===== | ||
| + | * CANDAR main symposium | ||
| + | * Long paper: 8-10 pages | ||
| + | * Regular paper: 5-7 pages | ||
| + | * Workshops (excluding WANC and NCSS) | ||
| + | * Regular paper: 5-7 pages | ||
| + | * Poster paper: 3-4 pages | ||
| + | * WANC workshop | ||
| + | * Short paper: 4-5 pages | ||
| + | * Poster paper: 2-3 pages | ||
| + | |||
| + | Submitted paper may be accepted as papers in shorter page-length category. | ||
| + | For example, CANDAR Long paper maybe accepted as CANDAR Regular paper. | ||
| + | If this is the case, the final paper must satisfy the page limitation of CANDAR Regular paper. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =====Double-blind review===== | ||
| + | Papers should **NOT** contain | ||
| + | authors names and affiliations | ||
| + | grant information and personal acknowledgements | ||
| + | On the other hand, authors previous related works **should not be omitted**, and | ||
| + | they must be referred to as **3rd-persons works**. | ||
| + | For example, if you improve your own prior work, you should write: | ||
| + | |||
| + | While the authors of [?] did X, this paper additionally did Y. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You SHOULD NOT write: | ||
| + | |||
| + | While our previous paper of [?] did X, this paper additionally did Y. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please see {{ :doubleblind.pdf |Sample PDF file}} for the details. | ||
| + | Papers do not satisfy these conditions for double-blind review may be rejected without review. | ||
